From: Bibliometric analysis of bacterial central nervous system infection research in Southeast Asia
| Country Profile | Publication Statisticsa | Spearman’s Rho Coefficient | P-valueb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population / million | Number of publicationsc | 0.418 | 0.229 |
| Citations | 0.745 | 0.013* | |
| Usage | 0.624 | 0.054** | |
| Captures | 0.685 | 0.029* | |
| Mentions | 0.415 | 0.233 | |
| Social media | 0.578 | 0.080** | |
| Scopus citations | 0.699 | 0.024* | |
| Average of Scopus field weighted citation impact (FWCI)d,e | 0.561 | 0.116 | |
| Valid articles with Scopus (FWCI)d | 0.452 | 0.222 | |
| GDP per capita | Number of publicationsc | 0.236 | 0.511 |
| Citations | 0.103 | 0.777 | |
| Usage | 0.261 | 0.467 | |
| Captures | 0.176 | 0.627 | |
| Mentions | 0.020 | 0.956 | |
| Social media | 0.292 | 0.413 | |
| Scopus Citations | 0.182 | 0.614 | |
| Average of Scopus field weighted citation impact (FWCI)d,e | 0.561 | 0.116 | |
| Valid articles with Scopus (FWCI)d | 0.452 | 0.222 | |
| % GDP for R&D | Number of publicationsc | 0.742 | 0.014* |
| Citations | 0.450 | 0.192 | |
| Usage | 0.468 | 0.172 | |
| Captures | 0.498 | 0.143 | |
| Mentions | 0.171 | 0.636 | |
| Social media | 0.494 | 0.147 | |
| Scopus Citations | 0.518 | 0.125 | |
| Average of Scopus field weighted citation impact (FWCI)d,e | 0.343 | 0.366 | |
| Valid articles with Scopus (FWCI)d | 0.510 | 0.160 | |
| Neurologists | Number of publicationsc | 0.721 | 0.019* |
| Citations | 0.867 | 0.001* | |
| Usage | 0.867 | 0.001* | |
| Captures | 0.867 | 0.001* | |
| Mentions | 0.570 | 0.086** | |
| Social media | 0.778 | 0.008* | |
| Scopus citations | 0.875 | 0.001* | |
| Average of Scopus field weighted citation impact (FWCI)d,e | 0.895 | 0.001* | |
| Valid Articles with Scopus (FWCI)d | 0.695 | 0.038* |